Legal Caravan Meaning

Reference documents: Article 29(1) of the Caravan Sites and Development Control Act 1960 Section 13(1) of the Caravan Sites Act 1968 Amendment of the definition of caravan 2006 BYRNE v SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE ENVIRONMENT and ARUN 1997 APPEAL SECRETART OF STATE 2002 Brentall BYRNE v Erewash A structure built on wheels, composed of a series of empty spaces, But without kitchen exists, bathroom or facilities, is not a caravan. Caravan structures don`t have to have all the facilities to live in, but they need to be designed to live, probably with the ability to protect themselves from the elements, a space to rest, and the ability to wash and cook. The case goes on to explain how the log cabin was „designed and assembled.” The defendants argue that although the caravan arrived in several parts, the structure could be divided into two parts because the ridge beam and floor sections were separated and connected only by bolts, it was „designed to be mountable in place with bolts and clamps” according to the definition of a caravan. The judge agrees, „I accept that if that were all that was necessary to comply with the subsection,” but refers to the phrase „separately constructed” in the statute. Any structure that does not fall within the portability and size criteria of the definition of a caravan in the amendment to the Caravan Sites Act of 1960, 1968 and 2006, or that has a sufficient degree of durability through physical attachment to the ground or core services, will charge for operational development. `In order to qualify for the designation `caravan` in Article 29, `the structure` must therefore have two characteristics. The first part of the article provides that „the structure” must be designed or adapted to human habitation. In my view, this is clearly the structure as a whole, as a unit and not its components. The second property that „the structure” must possess is mobility.

The structure must be capable of being moved by towing or transport on a single motor vehicle or trailer. „The structure envisaged in the second part of the stage” is, in my opinion, exactly the same structure as that provided for in the first part of the section and not a structure dismantled before loading. Therefore, in my view, the second part of the definition can only relate to the whole of a structure and not to its components. Section 13 of the Caravan Sites Act 1968 is not as clear as it could have been. Under the heading „Two-Unit Caravans”, it is stated that twin units do not consist of more than two parts designed or constructed in such a way that they can be assembled on site by means of bolts, pliers or other devices. If it is a caravan as defined by law or a single-family home, please provide a full explanation of your answer. It reads: „Any structure. that can be moved. towed or transported on a motor vehicle or trailer”. A towed caravan requires wheels and a towbar. A caravan transported on a trailer only needs to be placed on that trailer. So if a structure can be lifted onto a trailer or trailer placed underneath and the trailer can be moved with the structure, then that structure can be considered a caravan.

The caravan does not necessarily need to have wheels. A motorhome whose accessory was too wide to be legally moved on public roads, but which could legally be moved if divided into two components, was considered to fall within the legal definition of caravan. [7] Also in the legal definition of a caravan was a motorhome attached to a concrete wall and foundation by large bolts, since the bolts could be removed, and the wall and foundation were located only under a small part of the mobile home. Removing the towbar was not an obstacle to transporting the house, as it could drive in the back of a truck. [8] Section 13(1) of the Caravan Sites Act, 1968, which deals with two-unit caravans. Article 13(1) provides: In assessing the „construction criterion”, the inspector refers to Bryre v. SSE and Arun (the previous case we examined) for the term „does not consist of more than two separately constructed sections”. He ruled in the Supreme Court decision: „It was an essential part of the construction process. that there should be two sections, which should be built separately. If the construction process had not arisen by creating two separately built sections, which were then connected to each other.

The definition of a caravan. is not satisfied.” „They were not (satisfied) in this case because the log cabin in question, made of individual woods. had never consisted of 2 separately built sections joined together on the site”.