Compare Law and Morality

2. Kant supported Thomasius` view and stated in his famous report on the discrepancy between legality and morality that the difference lies in the fact that, although the law deals with external action, morality deals primarily with internal motives. Well, many would say that what he does to his body and family is immoral, but as the popular mantra says, if not completely valid, the government cannot legislate on morality. The law must wait for our imbibeur to threaten public safety. If he does not destroy someone else`s property, injure someone or get behind the wheel of a car, he is free to prosecute under the law. The law is enforced by the governing bodies of a country; State or community, as long as there is no such important body for the implementation of moral codes; However, they are followed by those taught by religious teachings and social ethics. Therefore, it is a difference between law and morality. For example, laws formulated for the purpose of eliminating evils and grievances such as drinking wine, gambling, stealing, accoitus, and murder are moral laws. They awaken our sense of morality and allow us to become ideal citizens. Only laws based on morality remain permanent.

So let`s start with the definitions of law and morality. 11. Finally, there is a classic discrepancy between the two concepts: law and morality are rooted in their change or modification. The law is deliberately and intentionally modified or supplemented by the State authorities. It could be the parliament – as is the case in several countries or around the world – or it could be leaders of the state, the community or the people, i.e. the government. But over time, law and morality were seen as unequal to each other. Nowadays, law and morality are seen as different sides of the same coin. But if we look at history, law and morality were considered equal and equal. A renowned lawyer John Austin said of the relationship between law and morality that law has nothing to do with morality. He distinguishes them as a positive law and a positive morality.

In summary, there are many cases of differences between law and morality in our society. It is often said that we only have to fear and obey the dictates of the law and turn a deaf ear to morality or turn a blind eye, because if the law is always ready to impose sanctions for disobedience, morality only has to torment our conscience. In all cultures and societies, there is a code of conduct that is not written down and should be followed by all members of society. This code of conduct defines what is right and wrong for individuals and groups and keeps them on the path that is desirable and acceptable to society. Morality stems from the previous system of taboos, in which people were discouraged from certain actions and behaviors in order to maintain peace and order in society. Morality is a concept that defines what is right and desirable and serves as a guide for people, as they can base their behavior and decisions on this system of morality. (4) Similarly, there are many things that are illegal in the eyes of the state but are acceptable to morality. For example, it is not a sin not to stay on the left or drive the vehicle quickly on the market.

The fact is that the canons of morality deal with moral duties, while the laws of the state deal with legal duties. (3) There are many things that are not illegal under the law, but are unacceptable to morality. For example, telling lies, showing shame to others, feeling greedy, being ungrateful and not helping the poor is not contrary to the spirit of the law. „We see the state,” says MacIver, „as the condition of morality. The State and the law constantly influence public opinion and action; The law, in turn, reflects public opinion and thus acts as an indicator of moral progress. The Japanese legal philosopher, political and human behavioral analyst Shigeaki Tanaka described morality as two types: private morality and social morality. He meant that private morality refers to the inner and subjective feelings of the individual.